4 ms·
I do not understand the dig against c# being less "efficient" than Ruby or Clojure.
by tarr11 14y ago
I do not understand the dig against c# being less "efficient" than Ruby or Clojure.
- largesse 14y agoHe's talking about programmer productivity per line of code, not machine efficiency.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- tarr11 14y ago{programming language argument goes here}
- Kequc 14y agoC was used to build modern languages which in turn replaced the jobs a lot of would be c developers could have had. It is the same kind of thing, progress means fewer people need to work.