There's a known method to get reproductive rates down currently being applied across the globe: affluence. There's no need to mandate it, people are getting the

There's a known method to get reproductive rates down currently being applied across the globe: affluence. There's no need to mandate it, people are getting there on their own. Of course, affluence is where most of the problem lies. The difference in environmental impact between a rich human and a poor human is much greater than between a poor human and no human. Which leads to a more accurate description of the problem: how do you make not destroying the planet more appealing than destroying the planet on an individual level?