Let's all keep in mind that this paper was published by physicists, in non-peer reviewed journals. There is a lot of jumping the gun in these articles, especia

Let's all keep in mind that this paper was published by physicists, in non-peer reviewed journals. There is a lot of jumping the gun in these articles, especially when it's the lead authors first and only paper. Here is a link to the actual paper: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.1845.pdf http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.1845.pdf Here is a slate article that has already proven that the data mined by the "Astrobiologists" is faulty and biased: http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/01/15/life_in_a_meteorite_claims_by_n_c_wickramasinghe_of_diatoms_in_a_meteorite.html http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/01/15/life_in_...