3 ms·

I agree, if they're doing that, then v0.8 should actually have been v0.08

• epidemian 14y ago
  What if they happen to reach 100 on the minor version, should they've named it "1.008" just in case? And if it reaches 1000?
  • aviraldg 14y ago
    Actually, I prefer the YY.MM format of versioning (like Ubuntu .)
    • untog 14y ago
      There are cases for both, IMO. The YY.MM model doesn't communicate when an upgrade is major and when it's just a minor change.