Their previous paper[1], and will only take about five to ten minutes to read, and gives you a pretty good idea what the level of this "journal" is. Phil Plait

Their previous paper[1], and will only take about five to ten minutes to read, and gives you a pretty good idea what the level of this "journal" is. Phil Plaitt also has a pretty good critique[2], but if you have the background, reading that paper should be enough to at least make you squint hard at their "science". There's a reason that people don't take the group seriously, and it's not fear from the establishment or whatever nonsense. [1] http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC21/PolonnaruwaRRRR.pdf http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC21/PolonnaruwaRRRR.pdf [2] http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/01/15/life_in_a_meteorite_claims_by_n_c_wickramasinghe_of_diatoms_in_a_meteorite.html http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2013/01/15/life_in_...