3 ms·
I didn't mean to flame, I thought we were having an interesting debate. I was under the impression we we're talking about logic systems in general where reducti
by DanWaterworth 14y ago
I didn't mean to flame, I thought we were having an interesting debate. I was under the impression we we're talking about logic systems in general where reductio ad absurdum exists, but the law of the excluded middle doesn't. Anyway, thanks, I learnt much.
- stiff 14y agoThis would be a very peculiar logic I think, maybe you just come from a very different background and hence all the hair-splitting was necessary, we just wandered so far away from the original point I lost patience, maybe unnecessarily, in the end it really was an interesting debate for me too.