"If he doesn't remember with precision, that's fine. Of course. Report it that way. Simple standard. What isn't fine is reporting precision that doesn't exist."

"If he doesn't remember with precision, that's fine. Of course. Report it that way. Simple standard. What isn't fine is reporting precision that doesn't exist." "Why are Elon's defenders hung up on this? It's a red herring." I don't see how it's fine to just push blatant dishonesty to the side..yea it's understandable for people not to remember with precision - which is why journalists/reviewers take notes. We as the reader accept that when a journalist presents (and later defends) precise numbers that are put toward their argument that there is some basis of accuracy to it. When logs show up refuting these claimed accuracies then you start to wonder where else have similar things been 'skewed'.