4 ms·
It seems that google's position is firmly that this agreement is not an admission that they infringed any patents. That said, it's a pretty funny statement comi
by TheZenPsycho 14y ago
It seems that google's position is firmly that this agreement is not an admission that they infringed any patents. That said, it's a pretty funny statement coming from an entity that just paid for patent licensing. The tricky thing about the situation is that the details of the agreement aren't clear enough to say who "won", and personally, it looks to me more like a stalemate. Even stalemate might be putting it strongly, as it implies that they are in some kind of opposition, which may not be the case.
- ratherbefuddled 14y ago"Paid for" is an assumption isn't it?
- TheZenPsycho 14y agoOh you're right. It seems they are being tight lipped about whether money was exchanged.