Try it this way - your suggestion is a variant of winner takes all. So for example if someone said that "its a problem of the science field that mathematicians

Try it this way - your suggestion is a variant of winner takes all. So for example if someone said that "its a problem of the science field that mathematicians and physicists are going into hedge funds" we would have to live with whatever outcome is being achieved. Speaking from a sheer utility point of view, this is not a best case scenario. From a Libertarian view, people are following incentives and making their choices, but its obvious an imbalance is being created. This imbalance may be unglamarous and solutions to it non-fundable, but it is one that MUST be addressed.