4 ms·
Android isn't community-driven, it's developed behind closed doors at Google. And the only thing it really has in common with linux distros is the linux kernel.
by jmhain 14y ago
Android isn't community-driven, it's developed behind closed doors at Google. And the only thing it really has in common with linux distros is the linux kernel.
- d_theorist 14y agoExactly. What I want to know is where the mobile Debian is. Where the mobile Arch is. Where the mobile Slackware, openSUSE, Fedora, Linux Mint etc etc etc is. There are a million desktop distributions driven purely by community efforts. Why is it so much harder to do it for mobile? Is the hardware just too difficult to work with? Too much variety? Is there no interest from the community? Are mobile interfaces too hard for hackers to do right? What's the reason?
- jmhain 14y ago> Is the hardware just too difficult to work with? Too much variety? I'm sure this makes it more difficult. Most mobile devices are locked and require some significant hacks to makes them boot an alternative OS. On top of that, each one requires a completely different kernel. There's currently no mainline support for most ARM SoC's, although I know that is being worked on. > Is there no interest in the community? I think this might be it. Most hackers are happy with Android. It's 'open-source' and they can run community-driven custom ROMs. Most Linux desktop environments suck on a touch screen anyway so there's not much incentive to install a linux distro. Also, take a look at Arch Linux ARM if you haven't heard of it. It runs on a lot of ARM boards very similar to what's inside smartphones and tablets. It really should be only a minor effort to get that on phones and tablets but few are bothering to do it.