4 ms·
You're creating a web site and want to lower the entry barrier for people signing up. So you require nothing more than a valid email address to register. So f
by tmoertel 19y ago
You're creating a web site and want to lower the entry barrier for people signing up. So you require nothing more than a valid email address to register. So far, so good. But now some of your users have forgotten their login passwords. Now what? How do you reconnect them to their accounts?
One option is to send account-recovery tokens to their email addresses. (That is the method described in the post that you linked to.) It's a reasonable method because a valid email address was all it took for your users to register in the first place. The account-recovery emails amount to asking the recipients re-perform the original registration test: do they own the email addresses they claim to own? If the accounts are worth the same now as when the users signed up (i.e., virtually nothing), that test is probably all you need.
If, however, users can accumulate real value on your site, even if the value is small, attackers will have incentive to hijack accounts. So the test for reclaiming an account must be less susceptible to attack than the do-you-own-this-email-address test, which is fairly weak.
Unfortunately, that's where your options start to become expensive in terms of usability. Most users are familiar with entering passwords, receiving emails, and clicking on links, but beyond that is probably asking too much of casual web surfers. You can't ask them to sign challenge messages with their private keys and expect them to know what you're talking about.
Hence the popularity of security questions. Users are familiar with filling out forms and answering questions, so it's a plausible option for account recovery. But, as I'm sure you are aware, it has problems. It's not very secure because the answers to many security questions are limited and therefore can be guessed. Further, many people are reluctant to provide the answers in the first place because the "good" questions are invasive. People are rightfully suspicious when you ask for their mothers' maiden names. So if your site uses security questions, you raise the barrier for initial registration, and you'll lose some users right there.
So what other options do you have? If your accounts are somehow tied to the physical world, say to bank accounts or credit cards, you can piggyback off of real-world authentication. But that's probably not an option for most Web 2.0 sites.
If none of those options work for you, consider not offering account recovery at all. When users sign up, make it very clear (several times) that if they lose their passwords, they are effectively locked out. Tell them to write down their passwords and store them in a safe location. For certain kinds of sites, it's a reasonable option.
There are other options, too, each imposing a different set of burdens on your users and offering different degrees of reliability in exchange. Ultimately, which is best for you depends on your goals, your users, and your aversion to risk. There is no one-size-fits all approach for sites requiring more than trivial security.
(If all you need is trivial security, however, there is a minimal entry level for all such sites: salt and hash each and every password using a hash function designed for password hashing, and use recovery tokens for account recovery. Less-secure options are not any easier, for you or your users, so there's no justification for them.)
Cheers. --Tom