2 ms·

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem But is not the classic case of Ad-hominem, you did a deduction from point B to

• jessedhillon 14y ago
  It's not as hominem to say that you do not have facts. Moreover, I already said that being logically correct is not my aim. Your argument lacks relevance or informedness, so you can make as many valid points as you want, your words simply have no correlation to reality.
  • jQueryIsAwesome 14y ago
    Correlation with reality? If I wanted to speak the news I would become an anchorman. Most people here is discussing how things _should_ be and how that could become a reality. And say what you want, Im pretty sure white female rape-victims is not a valid meet up.
    • jessedhillon 14y ago
      When did "white" get added? Also, you could have easily searched for this: http://www.raap.org/support-groups.html http://www.raap.org/support-groups.html As you obviously know nothing of rape, and probably not much of women either, I really have to question why you're still typing. You seem to be woefully unqualified to be participating in any conversation about what _should_ be, even supposing, as you have, that such a conversation doesn't need to be informed with facts.
      • jQueryIsAwesome 14y ago
        "White" excludes 40% of Americans, "female" excludes 50%. Its just semantics.