3 ms·

Is there a (non-malevolent) reason for this clause? It seems to be something put in to deliberately slow down proceedings and apply a penalty to the accused re

Is there a (non-malevolent) reason for this clause? It seems to be something put in to deliberately slow down proceedings and apply a penalty to the accused regardless of what happens.

px1999 14y ago
It's there to deter fake counternotices by giving the original issuer time to seek an injunction / file a lawsuit I think.
- cm127 14y ago
  Are there penalties for being wrong or mistaken? It seems pretty one-sided.
  - ZoFreX 14y ago
    Not for mistaken so much but if you can prove mal intent, yes there are penalties.