4 ms·
You're missing that the whole point here is that when read-eval is set to false then, precisely, you're making your intent very clear: you do NOT want to execut
by martinced 14y ago
You're missing that the whole point here is that when read-eval is set to false then, precisely, you're making your intent very clear: you do NOT want to execute code you didn't write.
The problem is that there's a hole due to Java constructors being called (even when read-eval is set to false).