3 ms·
So long as there's someone who mines coins and who accepts satoshidice transactions, they will eventually be completed. Being discriminated against slows your t
by Tuna-Fish 14y ago
So long as there's someone who mines coins and who accepts satoshidice transactions, they will eventually be completed. Being discriminated against slows your transactions down, it does not prevent them.
The way the system is designed to deal with discriminating miners is to allow all discrimination (a miner can choose which txns to include based on any criteria he/she wishes), but diluting their choices by having enough miners.
SatoshiDice is actually very useful for the network, because it allows us to test how it functions in a saturated environment long enough in advance that we can make changes if they are needed.
- larrydag 14y agoYet this action does seem like collusion which was the oringal point. I didn't know transactions could be excluded as well. Who's to say that in the future miners could collude against certain merchants?
- Nursie 14y agoOh they could if they wanted, and if they knew what the addresses in use by the merchant were. This could be made difficult by the merchant continually generating new addresses. The merchant could also add a little sweetener (transaction fee), and it feels pretty likely that a proportion of the wider BTC community would overcome their (presumably) ethical concerns and process the transactions anyway. But yes, in principle, colluding miners could make life difficult for merchants they dislike. This is one reason why a large and divers base of miners is important to the BTC system.