3 ms·

I was troubled, but read the article. It was a little breathless, but seemed okay. Though I didn't like clicking through a link on HN and seeing, essentially,

by davi 18y ago

I was troubled, but read the article. It was a little breathless, but seemed okay. Though I didn't like clicking through a link on HN and seeing, essentially, "Garden of Eden located!" I was suspicious enough that I googled Gobekli Tepe and found this Smithsonian article: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-te... So at least I knew the subject was valid before reading further on the submitted link. Definitely seems like a weird source though.

jackchristopher 18y ago
I read all the links from Wikipedia entry and searched for more articles before submitting, but I liked this one. But all articles I found beside the Wikipedia one, had something I didn't like; they were boring, less information, or had needless speculation. But the submitted one despite the speculation had extra detail. I never heard of Fortean Time. I didn't know of their reputation.