4 ms·
That's nice to know, it seems that we have the "hard" configuration at the lab and it's a real pain. Backwards compatibility, you know. For my mini-cluster we u
by carlesfe 14y ago
That's nice to know, it seems that we have the "hard" configuration at the lab and it's a real pain. Backwards compatibility, you know. For my mini-cluster we use SMB and couldn't be happier.
- EwanToo 14y agoNot sure what your lab's trying to be backwards compatible with (NFS has had those mount options since at least 1989), but whatever works for you :) It's a mount option on the client, not the server, so maybe you can change it yourself. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1094.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1094.txt
- ominous_prime 14y agoIn a lot of cases, hard is what you want. Some systems can't deal with fs errors very well, and it's better to wait than to risk data inconsistencies.