I understand what you are saying, and it certainly has an element of truth, but I don't think it's as valid as many companies think. The liability exposure occ

I understand what you are saying, and it certainly has an element of truth, but I don't think it's as valid as many companies think. The liability exposure occurs in the hiring process not the onboarding process. When they interview these people MULTIPLE times and act (if you use the articles examples) in bizarre ways during that process, the liability and prosecution risk is already there. It may very well be the reason some companies do these things, but its not going to help them a lick. Hiring incompetence is an obvious sign of what the work environment would likely be. It seems that most people in this country have just accepted the interview process as a 1 way thing. It's not, it shouldn't be, and the examples of why its broken are readily apparent.