3 ms·
Any reason why you haven't tried using Sidekiq, which is much more efficient in terms of using memory resources? Or is Resque just good enough for now?
by AznHisoka 14y ago
Any reason why you haven't tried using Sidekiq, which is much more efficient in terms of using memory resources? Or is Resque just good enough for now?
- spimmy 14y agoHm, well Sidekiq wasn't out when we started developing. :) Memory has never been a constraint for us with resque though. The only problems we've had with it have been things like improper signal handling, pretty easy to deal with.