4 ms·
I'd definitely say that Ember is more Desktop MVC than MVC2. True to it's Sproutcore/Cocoa roots, you are supposed to be able to wire up a lot of the applicatio
by blktiger 14y ago
I'd definitely say that Ember is more Desktop MVC than MVC2. True to it's Sproutcore/Cocoa roots, you are supposed to be able to wire up a lot of the application with the built-in controllers that don't have to be customized (or at least customized very little). Ember is trying to take that approach, make it more familiar to web developers, and add in some additional parts that are part of what makes the internet work (ie, routers for managing state/bookmarkable urls).
- steveklabnik 14y ago> MVC2. While we're being pedantic, it's Model 2, not MVC2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_2
- blktiger 14y agoSilly me. :P
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]