5 ms·
Yes, a bad one by professional standards, but yes.
by electic 14y ago
Yes, a bad one by professional standards, but yes.
- lowboy 14y agoSo how would you feel if I described myself as a singer upon meeting someone, having only sang for 3 minutes out of the decades of my life? "Oh, hi, I'm lowboy, and I'm a singer".
- electic 14y agoHere is a description of a patent troll. In this case, we have a DMCA troll. "one or more" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll
- jakelazaroff 14y ago"with no intention to manufacture or market the product." So, no.
- lowboy 14y agoThat doesn't really speak to the issue. Please answer my question about me describing myself as a singer. Would you feel I was being dishonest as describing myself as such?
- coldtea 14y agoNot at all. It doesn't matter if you sang for 10 minutes or for 100 hours. There is no magic threshold number. If you identify yourself as a singer, you can claim to be one legitimately. You would only be dishonest if you claimed to be a professional singer or a regular singer.
- lowboy 14y agoI don't think that claim would have any merit though, much as if someone opened up Chrome dev tools one day, edited an html attribute and solely based on that experience called themselves a web developer. I feel it would be dishonest, or at the very least woefully ignorant of common usage of language when someone is described as an *-er.
- arjie 14y agoIf you shag a sheep once...