3 ms·
> The way you priced things is cute, but shows that these are numbers that you made up What it sounds like you're driving toward is better documenting the rati
by doktrin 14y ago
> The way you priced things is cute, but shows that these are numbers that you made up
What it sounds like you're driving toward is better documenting the rationale behind the cost. To my untrained eye, the costs scaled with usage in a fairly familiar pattern.
What would you do to better illustrate the logic behind a pricing structure?
> The standard pricing model [1] works. Stick to it.
[1] - Use .99, .97, or .95 instead of whole numbers. Use odd numbers. Example: 127.99 or 129.99 for your lowest plan.
When I see "x.99" prices I always think "annoying gimmick" and typically associate it with low cost consumer goods.
Is there any evidence this type of pricing is appropriate for B2B products?
- ckluis 14y agoI was just thinking that consumers of B2B products aren't as easily influenced with pricing gimmicks.
- dminor 14y ago> When I see "x.99" prices I always think "annoying gimmick" and typically associate it with low cost consumer goods. It doesn't have to be .99 cents, but there is a reason people do this: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100119111051.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100119111051.ht...