4 ms·

You should charge for it.

tobyjsullivan 14y ago
I agree. Free demo on website + charge for app = profit... probably. Does the website demo work on an iPhone (I don't have one to test)?
- ktusznio 14y ago
  This only works if their site gets views and the free demo gets plays. In my experience, apps in the App Store are primarily found through the App Store, meaning potential users won't hit the site first to try the demo. The standard solution is to give away a bunch of levels for free and charge for additional levels using IAPs.
  - tobyjsullivan 14y ago
    I'm guessing that demo is getting a lot of plays right now and they should capitalize on the hype that's being built. Relying on the App Store is a good strategy for development firms that cannot build their own hype. So far, I'm guessing these guys are doing an okay job. But I have zero data on any of this, hopefully they do and are acting appropriately.
damoncali 14y ago
By the way, the parent of this comment is getting a lot of up votes. Others seem to agree with me.
exch 14y ago
He/she probably can't. The concept is not new. Here's a flash version of the same game. it is a few years old. [1]: http://www.addictinggames.com/puzzle-games/3dlogic2.jsp http://www.addictinggames.com/puzzle-games/3dlogic2.jsp
- alanctgardner2 14y ago
  Who says you need completely novel gameplay mechanics to charge money for an app? Surely more polish, hand-built levels and an app are sufficient. Whether OP would make more on ads or IAP remains to be seen, though. An IAP to get more levels would be a good way to hook users.
  - ruswick 14y ago
    The overwhelming majority of app users would not pay a cent for any app, much less a game. Free sells.
- damoncali 14y ago
  I saw someone charging for a game based on the exact same principle last week. No reason not to.
- itsybitsycoder 14y ago
  Angry Birds wasn't a new concept either.
- zxcdw 14y ago
  People charge for Chess apps. :)
- Macsenour 14y ago
  exch, you point to the mother of all "we stole your game play and made a new game" sites. :)
- NoodleIncident 14y ago
  I was looking for this, I knew I had played it before. This one has much better controls on the web app, as well.
seanalltogether 14y ago
We felt that out of the gate making it free to download was our best chance for success, but who know, if we start getting into A/B testing in the future, we may find that keeping the game free in the browser and charging for app store installs is the way to go.

I agree. Free demo on website + charge for app = profit... probably. Does the website demo work on an iPhone (I don't have one to test)?

ktusznio 14y ago
This only works if their site gets views and the free demo gets plays. In my experience, apps in the App Store are primarily found through the App Store, meaning potential users won't hit the site first to try the demo. The standard solution is to give away a bunch of levels for free and charge for additional levels using IAPs.
- tobyjsullivan 14y ago
  I'm guessing that demo is getting a lot of plays right now and they should capitalize on the hype that's being built. Relying on the App Store is a good strategy for development firms that cannot build their own hype. So far, I'm guessing these guys are doing an okay job. But I have zero data on any of this, hopefully they do and are acting appropriately.

damoncali 14y ago

By the way, the parent of this comment is getting a lot of up votes. Others seem to agree with me.

exch 14y ago

He/she probably can't. The concept is not new. Here's a flash version of the same game. it is a few years old. [1]: http://www.addictinggames.com/puzzle-games/3dlogic2.jsp http://www.addictinggames.com/puzzle-games/3dlogic2.jsp

alanctgardner2 14y ago
Who says you need completely novel gameplay mechanics to charge money for an app? Surely more polish, hand-built levels and an app are sufficient. Whether OP would make more on ads or IAP remains to be seen, though. An IAP to get more levels would be a good way to hook users.
- ruswick 14y ago
  The overwhelming majority of app users would not pay a cent for any app, much less a game. Free sells.
damoncali 14y ago
I saw someone charging for a game based on the exact same principle last week. No reason not to.
itsybitsycoder 14y ago
Angry Birds wasn't a new concept either.
zxcdw 14y ago
People charge for Chess apps. :)
Macsenour 14y ago
exch, you point to the mother of all "we stole your game play and made a new game" sites. :)
NoodleIncident 14y ago
I was looking for this, I knew I had played it before. This one has much better controls on the web app, as well.

seanalltogether 14y ago

We felt that out of the gate making it free to download was our best chance for success, but who know, if we start getting into A/B testing in the future, we may find that keeping the game free in the browser and charging for app store installs is the way to go.