2 ms·
While I agree this article makes sweeping generalizations, grossly misrepresents data (like the rancher story), relies on unfounded FUD, etc., I just want to po
by bobwaycott 14y ago
While I agree this article makes sweeping generalizations, grossly misrepresents data (like the rancher story), relies on unfounded FUD, etc., I just want to point out that the unredacted copy (the only one I've read) does in fact contain a statement about weapons:
>>> 3.5.3.1.7 Shall (T) be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not (based on position of arms) at a slant range of one and a half times the specified Operating Altitude.
... unless you think that means determining if the standing person actually has standard-issue appendages attached to his or her shoulders.