3 ms·
bitcoin FAQ covers this: nothing. Link: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#What_if_someone_creates_a_new_block_chain.2C_or_a_new_digital_currency_that_renders_Bitc
by daliusd 14y ago
bitcoin FAQ covers this: nothing.
Link: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#What_if_someone_creates_a_new_block_chain.2C_or_a_new_digital_currency_that_renders_Bitcoin_obsolete.3F https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#What_if_someone_creates_a_new...
- ccozan 14y agoQED. Take my advice (and prediction too): Energy backed currencies will be the future. Not now, but in 50-100 years. Gold ( used to back currencies now) is also popular, but it has also _some_ intrinsic value attached to it. But at some point the switch will be made so that the currencies will be backed by the amounts of energy reserves/production.
- daliusd 14y agoAnd dollar is backed by nothing but trust and actually dollar is nothing but numbers in computers: some of dollars has paper form but it is minority as far as I know. I am not saying that you are not right. I personally see why bitcoin might succeed. By some aspects it already succeeded having in mind that their total value is 200 milion dollars (am I right?). Question is if people will trust more centralized currencies or decentralized.
- rvkennedy 14y agoEnergy backed currencies? Energy is in a constant state of flux from low to high-entropy states. And 50-100 years from now, energy will be the one thing that isn't in short supply, given that the sun sends more of it our way per year than we've used in human history: see http://www.sandia.gov/~jytsao/Solar%20FAQs.pdf http://www.sandia.gov/~jytsao/Solar%20FAQs.pdf - page 10: 480 exajoules (EJ) strikes the Earth per 90 minutes. Convert that to the yearly number, and compare to worldwide energy consumption in the year 2001 of 430 EJ, bearing in mind that we didn't use much before the 19th century.
- r00fus 14y agoSo you're a SMAC player? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid_Meiers_Alpha_Centauri http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sid_Meiers_Alpha_Centauri I'm sure Firaxis wasn't the first to think of this idea - but it does make sense as energy has intrinsic utility and value. If not pure energy, then definitely currency backed by resources that create energy (ie, solar farms, gas/coal mines, nuke plants, etc).