2 ms·
> I don't dispute the need for surveillance Then _you've_ already conceded the argument. There is absolutely no need for surveillance.
by javert 14y ago
> I don't dispute the need for surveillance
Then _you've_ already conceded the argument.
There is absolutely no need for surveillance.
- mpyne 14y agoHow else are we supposed to catch politicians making crooked deals to screw over the taxpayer then?