The way law is structured, you can reach any conclusion. This means if you are relying on law to protect you from government sanctioned assassination, the const

The way law is structured, you can reach any conclusion. This means if you are relying on law to protect you from government sanctioned assassination, the constitution is only going to protect you if it can physically deflect a hellfire missile. If the government wants it to be legal to assassinate you, they will make it so. edit: I can't help but appreciate the fact that you and I are arguing over my usage of the word semantics.