3 ms·
Note that this is a series of posts. The first post that is being linked to doesn't have much IMO. http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/21/monads-part-one/ http://er
by ufo 14y ago
Note that this is a series of posts. The first post that is being linked to doesn't have much IMO.
http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/21/monads-part-one/ http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/21/monads-part-one/
http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/25/monads-part-two/ http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/25/monads-part-two/
http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/28/monads-part-three/ http://ericlippert.com/2013/02/28/monads-part-three/
I wasn't clear for me but in the last post he mentioned that there would be more posts to come.
- interconnector 14y agoThere's a part four as well: http://ericlippert.com/2013/03/04/monads-part-four/ http://ericlippert.com/2013/03/04/monads-part-four/
- dons 14y agoHe sure takes his time.. Episode 4: Conclusion: But we are so close! Next time on FAIC we'll make a small but vital modification to the signature pattern ApplyFunction to arrive at the actual second requirement of the monad pattern.
- Locke1689 14y agoEric is attempting to explain it to a wide class of C# developer -- most of whom are pretty unfamiliar with lambdas and higher-order functions, much less eclectic type polymorphism and computation.