4 ms·
I think this is a bad example, because one of the YouTube video comments are right (to me): "The point you are trying to make is lost when you film people in a
by bluetidepro 14y ago
I think this is a bad example, because one of the YouTube video comments are right (to me): "The point you are trying to make is lost when you film people in a private place! That actually is not allowed." This experiment is sort of flawed since he does just budge into private rooms/settings and everything without permission. Also, I suspect he has a decent size camera (by some of the reactions), and not something discrete like Google Glass. I wonder if people would have reacted any differently if he was just doing this with Google Glass and it wasn't as obvious he had a big camera on them. He would have probably been treated just like anyone else interrupting a class or private setting. Also, they wouldn't have mentioned the video, but the results would have been the same.
I would like to see this experiment done in a public settings, or this same experiment but with a much more discrete camera.
- ohwp 14y agoIn the other parts he is filming in public and is getting the same reactions. Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bT1ZfRtrJc Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHG9ouQ17-M But I'm not sure it's the size of the camera. Most of the people are not bothered by big cameras hanging everywhere. Maybe it's because they don't trust the intents of the guy who is filming.
- qompiler 14y agoOke now imagine 10 people around you with Google Glass on their head. You don't even know if they are recording you or not.