3 ms·
Comparing global traffic for Justin.TV and Hulu borders on being idiotic since Hulu is, um let's see, not accessible outside the US. How can TC write a whole ar
by mustpax 18y ago
Comparing global traffic for Justin.TV and Hulu borders on being idiotic since Hulu is, um let's see, not accessible outside the US. How can TC write a whole article about this and not even mention this pretty pertinent fact?
Edit: It's been pointed out that the article does mention that Hulu is only available in the U.S. Sorry, totally missed that. The article still seems trollish though.
- profgubler 18y agoI agree they could mention it, but i think they are trying to show a trend. The trend is what is important in this story. It shows live video on the web has an audience. Personally i use justin.tv to watch European cycling races that you can't watch in the US.
- dtap 18y agoOf course, Hulu is only available in the U.S., where it is fourth most popular video site
- drusenko 18y agoThe title is very misleading. It is not saying that Justin.TV outside the US is bigger than Hulu outside the US. The article is saying that Justin.TV (global, including the US) is bigger than Hulu (only available in the US). That is a true statement, even if it is also worth pointing out that Hulu only reaches US consumers, so in percentage terms, it reaches a larger percent of its audience, even though it is smaller on an absolute scale to Justin.TV.