4 ms·
"choose between cutting significant features from the app or only shipping our new version to the newest Android phones (ICS and up)" The ICS move wouldn't hav
by chuinard 14y ago
"choose between cutting significant features from the app or only shipping our new version to the newest Android phones (ICS and up)"
The ICS move wouldn't have been a bad option. It would've helped a lot of users convert to ICS+ devices, which Google probably would've loved.
The APIs from 4+ are much more robust than pre-ICS, and it probably would've saved more headaches while building the new version in addition to the one already described in the post.
- bvdbijl 14y agoYeah except they souls shut out lots of users
- tspiteri 14y agoThe ICS move wouldn't have been a bad option. Maybe in a couple of years, but not yet. Pre-ICS Android still has more than 50% of Android's share. http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
- chucknthem 14y agoAndroid 2.2 and 2.3 devices are still being released on low end phones, especially in developing countries, so the number of pre-ICS users are actually growing, not shrinking.
- psionski 14y agoBought one a year ago (2.3.3, I think). It's a Wildfire S, very small and lightweight, has a web browser. Can make calls and probably can send short messages. I was using Windows Mobile 2003 before that and thought I was finally on the "bleeding edge" of mobile technology, only to find out a month later that Android 2.3 is considered "legacy" and they are talking about not supporting it? What, are we supposed to buy new phones every five years now?
- dhugiaskmak 14y agoare we supposed to buy new phones every five years now? No. Every two.