So individual soldiers now get to decide which information is actually sensitive and which is not? Not even remotely what anyone who argues in favor of Manning

So individual soldiers now get to decide which information is actually sensitive and which is not? Not even remotely what anyone who argues in favor of Manning's actions is arguing... there should be a limit to the amount of morally questionable information an employee should let happen before he/she decides to blow the whistle. Manning committed a crime, quite willingly, because he viewed the end result as being worth some amount of personal sacrifice/inconvenience. <jest>I must admit your style of argument (smart but bizarrely tangential) makes me wonder if you are part of some kind of astroturfing campaign targeting the HN discussion of this topic.</jest>