Yeah, it does sound tough and kudos for pushing through. You should really dissect Skyscanner though. I've just done a search for London to Denmark in April on

Yeah, it does sound tough and kudos for pushing through. You should really dissect Skyscanner though. I've just done a search for London to Denmark in April on both your site and Skyscanner. Skyscanner: I'm shown all available cities and their best price in < 2 seconds. Click through to the entire month grid where I can play around with out and in flight dates in a nice compact chart. Best price Copenhagen £26 on the 24th. Adioso: The search snaps to Denmark, AU (can you weight destinations by population?). The correction option you offer is nice though. It takes around 10 seconds to start returning prices and 30 seconds until complete. Once I select a destination I'm not a fan of your results. The slider to see more than 7 days really gets on my nerves. Having to wait again after I thought I was done with waiting is exhausting. When I want to select a return flight I then have to decide from three options: I have to think too much. With the Skyscanner grid I can play and see 'okay Wednesday to Sunday seems to be cheapest, I was going to go Friday to Monday but I'll stay longer'. Best price Copenhagen £26 on the 16th. I'm impatient especially when shopping around for the best price. I really think unless you achieve the performance comparable to the Skyscanner guys you'll be dead in the water. You have something here and have clearly achieved a lot. But essentially I think you've overstretched and sacrificed a very important quality: speed and UX.