Sorry I did a define on usurping and ended up being pedantic because I don't believe its true. I understand all the concerns about how it will impact the globa

Sorry I did a define on usurping and ended up being pedantic because I don't believe its true. I understand all the concerns about how it will impact the global community; But isn't it generally seen that competition is good, and who's resources is it spreading or fragmenting? * A distribution who tries to cater to everyone? * Other companies employees who now need to understand and support technology it doesn't want to use? * "Linux" users in double quotes because they want to be able to administrate all their different boxes with different distro's using the same old tools of 20 years ago? * FOSS coders who spend their free time fixing bugs and adding features to projects they like and use? Call me ignorent and please point out why. But I don't see any of the above as resource issues. The only problem is the "Linux" users and I feel if they start to see themselves as distro's users instead of a name given to a Kernel and Foundation, that problem will sort it self out. By your account it seems like it already started and Ubuntu might be able to bring in a second or third option. By the looks of it the greater community wanted Ubuntu to rather spend time in bending tools to do what it needs to do, to benefit the community. Without realising Ubuntu is a product of a company that has goals and can not always take the long road of community inputs, but at least it tries do be open as much as it can. Which gets criticized a lot because it is a leader in a "linux" environment it mostly created from scratch.