I think this comment on the article is worth reading: blumentopf am 04. March 2013 um 22:06: "Note that 175.45.176.0/22 is visible behind China Unicom in the g

I think this comment on the article is worth reading: blumentopf am 04. March 2013 um 22:06: "Note that 175.45.176.0/22 is visible behind China Unicom in the global routing table (shortest AS path ends with 4837 131279), whereas 194.71.107.0/24 is only visible behind Intelsat (22351 131279 51040). It should therefore not come as a surprise that you see a different route when you’re doing a traceroute directly to 175.45.177.217. While you could be right it’s also conceivable that there’s a link between Cambodia and North Korea and that the next hop behind 202.72.96.6 is indeed 175.45.177.217 (in North Korea, not just a transit net for BGP handoff). So I don’t see this as conclusive evidence that it’s a fake."