4 ms·

...really? X is an abomination. But why not Wayland? Anyone care to present Canonical's argument, with concrete examples of what they find so offensive about i

by scarmig 14y ago

...really? X is an abomination. But why not Wayland? Anyone care to present Canonical's argument, with concrete examples of what they find so offensive about it?

minimax 14y ago
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MirSpec#Why_Not_Wayland_.2BAC8_Weston.3F https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MirSpec#Why_Not_Wayland_.2BAC8_Westo...
- wmf 14y ago
  If Wayland's input handling is not good enough, why didn't they raise that on the mailing list any time in the last few years? What does "The shell integration parts of the protocol are considered privileged from our perspective" even mean?