Citation needed. Also, assuming that account is accurate, that's no reason for a legislative ban on such research - it's a reason to remove that person from a

Citation needed. Also, assuming that account is accurate, that's no reason for a legislative ban on such research - it's a reason to remove that person from a position of influencing the course and outcomes of said research. Unless you're of the opinion that considering firearms as dangerous is in and of itself an indication of bias, in which case you're beyond reason.