>The CDC isn't allowed to conduct research into gun violence because they didn't even try to hide the fact that they were horribly biased. So just because the

>The CDC isn't allowed to conduct research into gun violence because they didn't even try to hide the fact that they were horribly biased. So just because the numbers didn't reach the conclusion that you agree with, they are automatically biased? >Here's a quote from Mark Rosenberg, former director of the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and the guy who led a personal crusade against guns under the guise of 'research': An out of context quote - and an ad hominem attack? As far as I can tell, your strategy at this point is to try and muddy the water. Meanwhile, here are some useful numbers to contemplate. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/pro-gun-myths-fact-check http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/pro-gun-myths-fa...