4 ms·
Couldn't they think of a more prejudicial title? The bill's substance is "plaintiffs to pay defendants". Plaintiffs are not trolls. Defendants are not innovator
by uvdiv 14y ago
Couldn't they think of a more prejudicial title? The bill's substance is "plaintiffs to pay defendants". Plaintiffs are not trolls. Defendants are not innovators. Unsuccessful lawsuits are not frivolous (article's opening paragraph).
And TechCrunch is not journalism.
- nlh 14y agoI would add the qualifier "not all" to your assertions.
- RougeFemme 14y agoI agree, generally, and I agree that the title is not unbiased. But I think that a lot of the patent plaintiffs are trolls, particularly those that do nothing but buy patents and then sue. And in those cases, the defendants are often not innovators. Some of those patents never should been granted, but that's for another thread.