5 ms·
You're missing his point. Its a safe assumption in the case that the latter gives you an error pointing you to the former. If the latter was a blank/meaningful
by Goopplesoft 14y ago
You're missing his point. Its a safe assumption in the case that the latter gives you an error pointing you to the former. If the latter was a blank/meaningful response that would make sense, but its not.
- nolok 14y agoYou misunderstood OP, the FB error he describe is not about hitting a url "path/" that 301 to "path" and FB not detecting it. In the uri standards, /path and /path/ are just as different as /path and /path2.