4 ms·
This... is just strange... Oh well, it seems like a simple example of a Go server, can anyone speak to the code quality? I'll say the angularJS isn't so great
by GhotiFish 14y ago
This... is just strange...
Oh well, it seems like a simple example of a Go server, can anyone speak to the code quality?
I'll say the angularJS isn't so great. No tests are implemented, and only rudimentary behavior is used.
Op you should use ng-change rather than a watch. those watch's are irritatingly undependable.
- lucisferre 14y agoWait is ng-change doing something und the hood other than using $watch?
- GhotiFish 14y agoYah. $watch ties into angularJS's model checking scheme. If anything at all happens in angularJS. It runs through all of the defined watches check functions to see if they return a different result. ng-change is an event triggering when the input element changes. watches can fire multiple times (I think up to 10), if the result of one watch changes the model, then angular will run all the checks again. watches have their place on custom directives, but they're otherwise a pain in the butt. I THINK this is how it works. I can tell you this with certainty: ng-change and $watch behave very differently.
- ganarajpr 14y agoActually ng-change is very much same as a $watch.. Here is the relevant source from Angular.. var ngChangeDirective = valueFn({ require: 'ngModel', link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) { ctrl.$viewChangeListeners.push(function() { scope.$eval(attr.ngChange); }); } });
- GhotiFish 14y agoWhile you're there, check out line 1033. Where it describes the behavior of $viewChangeListeners It triggers on the $setViewValue event. Not on detecting a model change event, like $watch. They are not the same.