3 ms·
That is already known to be incorrect. It's quite evident from his chats that he was reading them regularly. Also, it doesn't matter. No harm, no foul.
by lawnchair_larry 14y ago
That is already known to be incorrect. It's quite evident from his chats that he was reading them regularly.
Also, it doesn't matter. No harm, no foul.
- tptacek 14y agoI do not believe that you believe that Manning read all or even most of the documents in the dump. I think you believe like I do that there were a large number of documents in that dump he hadn't read, and could not have judged the safety of leaking.
- lawnchair_larry 14y agoEven if I grant you that for the sake of argument, what you are saying amounts to "he guessed correctly, but only accidentally, so we should still charge him as though he guessed incorrectly."
- tptacek 14y agoYes, on that point I see we genuinely disagree.