4 ms·
> If a soldier thinks something is wrong, he might talk to a reporter and even provide classified examples if necessary to prove his point. > That is not what
by Maxious 14y ago
> If a soldier thinks something is wrong, he might talk to a reporter and even provide classified examples if necessary to prove his point.
> That is not what Bradley Manning did.
Did you even read the article linked?
" Manning said he first tried to take his information to the Washington Post, the New York Times and Politico, before contacting WikiLeaks."
"Manning said he tried to talk to an unnamed Washington Post reporter to interest her in the Iraq and Afghanistan documents, but “I did not believe she took me seriously.” He left voicemails with the public editor and the news-tips lines for the New York Times and heard nothing. A blizzard, he said, kept him from driving to Politico’s office to discuss the documents. According to Manning’s account, only after his attempts to give the documents to mainstream media organizations fail did he consider giving them to WikiLeaks."
- cjensen 14y ago"Tried". "A blizzard kept him from ... discussing". Half-heared efforts to contact three media outlets are not cause for dumping intelligence unrelated to this issue you are trying to bring to light.
- plugger 14y agoWhy did Manning need to speak to anyone? Why couldn't he just send data discs to all the papers mentioned with the classified data? If his true motivation was whistle blowing you'd expect him to leak the data to as many media outlets as possible. Instead he sent them to Wikileaks?
- saraid216 14y agoIf someone applied for a job with the attitude Manning showed for publishing this information, would you even bother giving him an interview?