4 ms·
That's fair. Yes, we did consider changing. But we haven't had any issues ourselves or a real need for a structured database at this time. If we do in the futur
by _neil 14y ago
That's fair. Yes, we did consider changing. But we haven't had any issues ourselves or a real need for a structured database at this time. If we do in the future, transitioning won't be extremely painful because most of our historical data isn't critical; it would mainly just be user accounts.
For us, saying, "oh shit, a handful of other people had a bad experience – we should drop everything and move our data to postgres" would have been a bad decision and a waste of time/money.
- jacques_chester 14y agoThanks for the reply. I'm a pro-RDBMS bigot, but path dependency is path dependency. In your position I would probably make the same decision.