3 ms·
I think he means that the companies have a history of not being stuck with environmental cleanup costs or other secondary costs- and thus even if there will be
by DuskStar 14y ago
I think he means that the companies have a history of not being stuck with environmental cleanup costs or other secondary costs- and thus even if there will be enormous damages, it won't impact their profits.
- vannevar 14y agoAh yes, under that interpretation I would agree wholeheartedly.
- bluedanieru 14y agoEh, yeah and that's the correct one. In the interests of brevity I guess I left some ambiguity there in what I meant.