Interesting; I don't have the same take. If the OP's assertion is true, then he's referencing an under-recognized study of critical importance. If it's just hyp

Interesting; I don't have the same take. If the OP's assertion is true, then he's referencing an under-recognized study of critical importance. If it's just hyperbole sitting on top of truth (whether due to an incorrect recollection or otherwise), that's a big problem. Claims that have some truth to them, but which are not correct, are both endemic to and hazardous in healthcare. I will argue that in this type of conversation, claims of fact that are disputed but ultimately unsupported must be taken to be false until shown otherwise. (The fulltext of the article that you found doesn't use the terms "SSRI", "medication", "drug", or "therapy", but I haven't read it in depth to see if they're using some unusual synonyms.)