5 ms·
Our consultant network includes Nobel laureates, heads of biology departments, famous professors, and as top-rate people as one can find. They aren't on the fir
by apsec112 14y ago
Our consultant network includes Nobel laureates, heads of biology departments, famous professors, and as top-rate people as one can find. They aren't on the first version of the site because a) they're not full-time employees - being very busy, they usually only have a few hours a week - and b), before you ask someone to be on a website, you first have to show them the site, and the site's only been up for about twelve hours because it's launch day. We're currently compiling our business, scientific and medical advisory boards, and will have them up over the next few weeks.
Also, why the rudeness? In terms of the disagreement hierarchy (http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html), you're using DH1 through DH3 - attacking credentials and tone rather than facts.
- carbocation 14y ago> Also, why the rudeness? In terms of the disagreement hierarchy (http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html), you're using DH1 through DH3 - attacking credentials and tone rather than facts. I think you've got things turned around a bit here. He's not using claims of authority to spuriously attack an argument that you're making. You are the one asserting authority, and he's asking for proof. Since you are basing some of your credibility on authority, it seems like a reasonable request.
- michaelhoffman 14y agoIt's very hard to discuss the facts when you withhold them. I would like to know who these Nobel laureates are. If they have examined your service but do not have enough confidence in it to be associated with it publicly that is interesting information.