I am somone with a very low understanding of Video compression, who (working in a small company) had to create a "simple video compression system" for the dozen

I am somone with a very low understanding of Video compression, who (working in a small company) had to create a "simple video compression system" for the dozen of videos we put online everyday. I'm saying that becaouse I'm probably someone that may be interested in Beamr technology since my "video compression system" is mostly a bad mash up of mencoder and handbrake with a few tweaks that is used for automatically convert all our videos for the different bitrate/devices we stream to. The problem is that most of what you find in your website or your comment is marketing enhanced technical dumbed down mumbo jumbo. What someone with a little (very little) understanding of video compression would like to see is an example of Beamr working it's "magic" and see if it's really effective. A simple test would be to take a random sizable selection (at least 5/600) of different videos from different sources encoded with Beamr or with a vanilla version of x264 or others encoders tools. Then show us a chart (geeks love charts) of the difference in compression and (some examples of) the difference in quality to let us see how amazing Beamr actually is.