2 ms·
Sure, but is that much better? It reminds me of having to create named struct classes to simulate closures prior to C++11 lambdas. The language syntax just does
by twoodfin 14y ago
Sure, but is that much better? It reminds me of having to create named struct classes to simulate closures prior to C++11 lambdas. The language syntax just doesn't support that style of programming.
- marshray 14y agoSo how many languages actually do support this style directly? The C# async keyword looks pretty clean, just give C++ a decade or so to catch up.