3 ms·
Even if you compare #2 and #3 and they are similar quality, what would that prove? You could do #3 for a specific file after Beamr Video has processed it, but h
by drorgill 14y ago
Even if you compare #2 and #3 and they are similar quality, what would that prove? You could do #3 for a specific file after Beamr Video has processed it, but how would you know the right bitrate for #3 without applying Bearm Video in #2?
- waterlesscloud 14y agoI'm not on one side or the other here, but... What would prove your claims?
- 3327 14y agoIndependent person from the industry here following this (as I am sure there are many more onlookers to this thread). drorgill i think now is the time to provide some hard empirical evidence on your part, given the initial claims and a sample test done here it is my feeling that it should be relatively trivial to provide a counter example. cheers.
- jfb 14y agoHe could start by actually displaying an understanding of how video compression works, maybe.
- rorrr 14y agoIf you compare #2 and #3 and they are similar quality, it would prove your product is essentially not doing better than x264.